Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.756 > 0.728
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.076 > 0.708 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.722 > 0.580
Positive Predictive Value 0.797 < 0.918
Total TP 503 > 404
Total TN 74598 < 74789
Total FP 272 > 89
Total FP CONTRA 54 > 17
Total FP INCONS 74 > 19
Total FP COMP 144 > 53
Total FN 194 < 293
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 503
Total TN 74598
Total FP 272
Total FP CONTRA 54
Total FP INCONS 74
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.756
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.722
Positive Predictive Value 0.797
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.73 0.72 0.76 13 340 5 0 4 1 5
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2012 4 0 3 1 5
3A2K_C 0.74 0.73 0.76 16 1087 6 1 4 1 6
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 6 2 2 2 6
3IVN_B 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 884 2 2 0 0 6
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.54 0.63 51 25455 35 18 12 5 44
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 12 0 5 7 4
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3JYX_3 0.73 0.73 0.73 11 2363 26 0 4 22 4
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 32 5 2 25 2
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 9 2 4 3 10
3O58_2 0.92 0.90 0.93 28 2724 13 0 2 11 3
3O58_3 0.62 0.59 0.65 13 4744 18 5 2 11 9
3PDR_A 0.85 0.82 0.89 41 4794 9 2 3 4 9
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 404
Total TN 74789
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 293
Total Scores
MCC 0.728
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.580
Positive Predictive Value 0.918
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2WRQ_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 2 1150 4 0 0 4 7
2XKV_B 0.67 0.73 0.62 8 1822 22 0 5 17 3
2XQD_Y 0.48 0.24 1.00 5 1124 1 0 0 1 16
2XXA_G 0.83 0.74 0.93 26 2017 4 0 2 2 9
3A2K_C 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 1102 0 0 0 0 16
3AMU_B 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1152 1 0 0 1 14
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.43 0.77 41 25483 17 12 0 5 54
3IZF_C 0.67 0.46 1.00 16 2624 0 0 0 0 19
3JYV_7 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1106 1 0 0 1 15
3JYX_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 8 2368 8 0 2 6 7
3JYX_4 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 4746 3 0 0 3 2
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.79 0.65 0.96 24 2253 5 0 1 4 13
3O58_2 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2738 0 0 0 0 15
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.