Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.610 > 0.496
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.124 > 0.499 ± 0.053
Sensitivity 0.493 > 0.277
Positive Predictive Value 0.759 < 0.895
Total TP 242 > 136
Total TN 78719 < 78886
Total FP 128 > 20
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 5
Total FP INCONS 67 > 11
Total FP COMP 51 > 4
Total FN 249 < 355
P-value 2.00627773251e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 242
Total TN 78719
Total FP 128
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 249
Total Scores
MCC 0.610
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.493
Positive Predictive Value 0.759
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
3GX2_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 23 4344 5 0 4 1 17
3IVN_B 0.74 0.58 0.95 18 2327 1 1 0 0 13
3JYX_4 0.33 0.30 0.37 10 12219 32 2 15 15 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.69 0.59 0.82 27 6988 9 1 5 3 19
3O58_3 0.52 0.40 0.67 14 12382 17 2 5 10 21
3PDR_A 0.71 0.57 0.89 41 12834 9 0 5 4 31
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 2 6 0 19
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 36 2 17 17 28
4AOB_A 0.62 0.55 0.72 23 4339 10 0 9 1 19
4ENB_A 0.26 0.11 0.67 2 1272 1 0 1 0 17
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 78886
Total FP 20
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 355
Total Scores
MCC 0.496
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.499 ± 0.053
Sensitivity 0.277
Positive Predictive Value 0.895
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.