Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
NanoFolder |
| MCC |
0.627 |
>
|
0.316 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.574
±
0.443
|
>
|
0.345
±
0.403
|
| Sensitivity |
0.507 |
>
|
0.324 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.781 |
>
|
0.316 |
| Total TP |
75 |
>
|
48 |
| Total TN |
24522 |
>
|
24466 |
| Total FP |
32 |
<
|
114 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
<
|
15 |
| Total FP INCONS |
21 |
<
|
89 |
| Total FP COMP |
11 |
>
|
10 |
| Total FN |
73 |
<
|
100 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and NanoFolder).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and NanoFolder).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
75 |
| Total TN |
24522 |
| Total FP |
32 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
| Total FP INCONS |
21 |
| Total FP COMP |
11 |
| Total FN |
73 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.627 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.574
±
0.443
|
| Sensitivity |
0.507 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.781 |
| Nr of predictions |
4 |
Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
48 |
| Total TN |
24466 |
| Total FP |
114 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
15 |
| Total FP INCONS |
89 |
| Total FP COMP |
10 |
| Total FN |
100 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.316 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.345
±
0.403
|
| Sensitivity |
0.324 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.316 |
| Nr of predictions |
4 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|