Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.456 > 0.000
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.449 ± 0.126 > 0.000 ± 0.000
Sensitivity 0.322 > 0.000
Positive Predictive Value 0.649 > 0.000
Total TP 426 > 0
Total TN 737419 < 738075
Total FP 244 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 0
Total FP INCONS 211 > 0
Total FP COMP 14 > 0
Total FN 898 < 1324
P-value 1.31583660336e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 426
Total TN 737419
Total FP 244
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 211
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 898
Total Scores
MCC 0.456
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.449 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.322
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00599 0.06 0.04 0.10 4 101435 37 2 34 1 107
RFA_00601 0.20 0.13 0.32 15 99188 37 2 30 5 99
RFA_00602 0.15 0.09 0.26 10 101437 34 0 28 6 106
SRP_00011 0.65 0.48 0.88 50 46303 7 0 7 0 54
SRP_00015 0.53 0.36 0.78 36 46314 10 0 10 0 63
SRP_00152 0.46 0.38 0.57 39 45684 30 6 24 0 64
SRP_00178 0.55 0.40 0.75 41 45698 14 4 10 0 61
SRP_00179 0.59 0.42 0.85 44 46004 8 1 7 0 61
SRP_00181 0.80 0.67 0.96 68 45985 5 0 3 2 34
SRP_00182 0.52 0.38 0.73 38 46004 14 0 14 0 63
SRP_00184 0.38 0.25 0.58 25 46013 18 0 18 0 75
SRP_00188 0.52 0.42 0.65 33 31074 18 3 15 0 46
SRP_00308 0.41 0.26 0.66 23 36280 12 1 11 0 65

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 0
Total TN 738075
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 1324
Total Scores
MCC 0.000
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.000 ± 0.000
Sensitivity 0.000
Positive Predictive Value 0.000
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00599 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 101475 0 0 0 0 111
RFA_00601 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 99235 0 0 0 0 114
RFA_00602 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 101475 0 0 0 0 116
SRP_00011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46360 0 0 0 0 104
SRP_00015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46360 0 0 0 0 99
SRP_00152 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45753 0 0 0 0 103
SRP_00178 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45753 0 0 0 0 102
SRP_00179 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 105
SRP_00181 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 102
SRP_00182 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 101
SRP_00184 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 100
SRP_00188 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31125 0 0 0 0 79
SRP_00308 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36315 0 0 0 0 88

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.