Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) PknotsRG
MCC 0.854 > 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.858 ± 0.048 > 0.580 ± 0.435
Sensitivity 0.759 > 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.962 > 0.673
Total TP 101 > 70
Total TN 14628 < 14629
Total FP 12 < 35
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 8
Total FP INCONS 1 < 26
Total FP COMP 8 > 1
Total FN 32 < 63
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 14628
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 32
Total Scores
MCC 0.854
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.858 ± 0.048
Sensitivity 0.759
Positive Predictive Value 0.962
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 2 0 0 2 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 2 0 0 2 6
PDB_01020 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 2260 3 0 0 3 5
PDB_01073 0.79 0.71 0.89 24 4344 4 2 1 1 10

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 70
Total TN 14629
Total FP 35
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 63
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.435
Sensitivity 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.673
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.17 0.16 0.19 4 3300 17 6 11 0 21
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.23 0.22 0.26 5 2259 14 2 12 0 18
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 0 3 1 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.