CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.728 > 0.652
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.751 ± 0.171 > 0.694 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.756 > 0.669
Positive Predictive Value 0.710 > 0.648
Total TP 208 > 184
Total TN 14678 < 14687
Total FP 126 < 133
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 28
Total FP INCONS 62 < 72
Total FP COMP 41 > 33
Total FN 67 < 91
P-value 2.66715895098e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 208
Total TN 14678
Total FP 126
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 62
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 67
Total Scores
MCC 0.728
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.751 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.756
Positive Predictive Value 0.710
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 8 0 0 8 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 8 1 3 4 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 16 6 9 1 8
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 1 14 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 5 1 1 3 6
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 184
Total TN 14687
Total FP 133
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 91
Total Scores
MCC 0.652
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.694 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.669
Positive Predictive Value 0.648
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 14 247 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.58 0.55 0.62 16 2414 13 4 6 3 13
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 9 1 3 5 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.93 0.88 1.00 28 2112 0 0 0 0 4
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.