CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Cylofold
MCC 0.805 > 0.752
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.093 > 0.772 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.818 > 0.731
Positive Predictive Value 0.800 > 0.783
Total TP 632 > 565
Total TN 38123 < 38191
Total FP 227 > 193
Total FP CONTRA 28 < 34
Total FP INCONS 130 > 123
Total FP COMP 69 > 36
Total FN 141 < 208
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 632
Total TN 38123
Total FP 227
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 130
Total FP COMP 69
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.805
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.818
Positive Predictive Value 0.800
Nr of predictions 43

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 141 0 0 0 0 0
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_A 0.98 1.00 0.96 23 739 1 0 1 0 0
2L1F_B 0.98 1.00 0.96 24 766 1 0 1 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 8 0 0 8 0
2LWK_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 197 2 0 1 1 2
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 8 1 3 4 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 16 6 9 1 8
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3AKZ_H 0.19 0.20 0.21 4 1108 17 4 11 2 16
3AM1_B - 0.79 0.79 0.79 23 1437 6 0 6 0 6
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 1 14 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 5 1 1 3 6
3NDB_M - 1.00 1.00 1.00 44 3670 4 0 0 4 0
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 208 10 5 3 2 3
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3OVS_D - 0.82 0.83 0.83 10 204 2 0 2 0 2
3P22_G - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 301 1 0 1 0 1
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 565
Total TN 38191
Total FP 193
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 123
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 208
Total Scores
MCC 0.752
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.731
Positive Predictive Value 0.783
Nr of predictions 43

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 511 1 0 0 1 4
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 336 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 229 0 0 0 0 4
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.56 0.55 0.57 16 2412 13 4 8 1 13
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AM1_B - 0.83 0.76 0.92 22 1442 2 0 2 0 7
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J0L_7 - 0.41 0.50 0.36 5 505 10 3 6 1 5
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.55 0.50 0.62 16 2114 10 2 8 0 16
3NDB_M - 0.68 0.64 0.74 28 3676 14 2 8 4 16
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 1 212 6 1 2 3 2
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.63 0.42 1.00 5 149 0 0 0 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.