CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAalifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAalifold(seed)
MCC 0.681 > 0.640
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.792 ± 0.117 > 0.646 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.724 > 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.646 < 0.843
Total TP 427 > 289
Total TN 75643 < 75961
Total FP 318 > 72
Total FP CONTRA 102 > 23
Total FP INCONS 132 > 31
Total FP COMP 84 > 18
Total FN 163 < 301
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAalifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAalifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 427
Total TN 75643
Total FP 318
Total FP CONTRA 102
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 84
Total FN 163
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.792 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.724
Positive Predictive Value 0.646
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 0.98 1.00 0.96 24 766 1 0 1 0 0
2L1F_A 0.98 1.00 0.96 23 739 1 0 1 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 289
Total TN 75961
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 301
Total Scores
MCC 0.640
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.54 0.30 1.00 3 171 0 0 0 0 7
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 454 2 0 1 1 3
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 772 5 0 5 0 10
2L1F_A 0.68 0.61 0.78 14 745 4 0 4 0 9
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A3A_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 1481 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.71 0.65 0.79 15 884 4 2 2 0 8
3IYQ_A 0.36 0.27 0.48 14 22411 19 13 2 4 37
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.26 0.81 25 25505 8 6 0 2 70
3JYX_4 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 4749 2 0 0 2 5
3LA5_A 0.73 0.64 0.84 16 935 3 1 2 0 9
3NPB_A 0.77 0.59 1.00 22 2256 3 0 0 3 15
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.