CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna RNAwolf
MCC 0.684 > 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.695 ± 0.147 > 0.652 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.705 > 0.674
Positive Predictive Value 0.679 < 0.698
Total TP 186 > 178
Total TN 10300 < 10319
Total FP 115 > 104
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 15
Total FP INCONS 61 < 62
Total FP COMP 27 = 27
Total FN 78 < 86
P-value 0.00781880629872

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 186
Total TN 10300
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 78
Total Scores
MCC 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.695 ± 0.147
Sensitivity 0.705
Positive Predictive Value 0.679
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 9 1 3 5 3
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.63 0.62 0.67 8 472 8 0 4 4 5
3J0L_7 - 0.37 0.40 0.36 4 508 9 2 5 2 6
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 169 9 3 4 2 2
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 3 2 0 5
3RKF_A 0.82 0.79 0.86 19 844 3 1 2 0 5
3SD1_A 0.55 0.55 0.57 16 1505 12 4 8 0 13
3SIU_F - 0.69 0.75 0.67 6 136 3 0 3 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.68 0.75 0.63 12 1274 13 4 3 6 4

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 178
Total TN 10319
Total FP 104
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 62
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 86
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.652 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.674
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 133 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_Z - 0.62 0.63 0.63 5 594 7 1 2 4 3
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 536 11 1 7 3 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.54 0.88 7 476 5 0 1 4 6
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 1 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 4 1 2 2
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 103 6 0 5 1 5
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.