CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold RDfolder
MCC 0.703 > 0.530
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.712 ± 0.165 > 0.587 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.704 > 0.479
Positive Predictive Value 0.717 > 0.610
Total TP 200 > 136
Total TN 10501 < 10557
Total FP 100 > 94
Total FP CONTRA 26 > 21
Total FP INCONS 53 < 66
Total FP COMP 21 > 7
Total FN 84 < 148
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 200
Total TN 10501
Total FP 100
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 84
Total Scores
MCC 0.703
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.712 ± 0.165
Sensitivity 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 9 1 3 5 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 0 0 0 0 0
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 10557
Total FP 94
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 148
Total Scores
MCC 0.530
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.587 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.479
Positive Predictive Value 0.610
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 155 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_X - 0.57 0.57 0.57 4 537 5 0 3 2 3
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_8 - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 70 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 3 2 1 0 2
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 113 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.