CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold RNAwolf
MCC 0.683 > 0.552
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.709 ± 0.130 > 0.595 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.690 > 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.689 > 0.575
Total TP 336 > 266
Total TN 26259 < 26284
Total FP 203 < 249
Total FP CONTRA 42 > 37
Total FP INCONS 110 < 160
Total FP COMP 51 < 52
Total FN 151 < 221
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 336
Total TN 26259
Total FP 203
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.709 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.690
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 14 247 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.58 0.55 0.62 16 2414 13 4 6 3 13
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 9 1 3 5 3
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.31 0.31 0.33 8 2226 23 1 15 7 18
3J0L_h - 0.93 0.88 1.00 28 2112 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 0 0 0 0 0
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 7 0 5 2 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 266
Total TN 26284
Total FP 249
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 160
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 221
Total Scores
MCC 0.552
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.575
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 133 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 176 0 0 0 0 1
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.88 23 2414 11 0 3 8 6
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2YIE_Z - 0.62 0.63 0.63 5 594 7 1 2 4 3
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 536 11 1 7 3 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 1 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 4 1 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.14 0.15 0.15 4 2223 26 4 19 3 22
3J0L_h - 0.47 0.41 0.57 13 2117 12 1 9 2 19
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.54 0.88 7 476 5 0 1 4 6
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 103 6 0 5 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.