CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold Vsfold5
MCC 0.678 > 0.525
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.133 > 0.602 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.685 > 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.683 > 0.538
Total TP 328 > 253
Total TN 26135 < 26145
Total FP 201 < 254
Total FP CONTRA 42 < 49
Total FP INCONS 110 < 168
Total FP COMP 49 > 37
Total FN 151 < 226
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Vsfold5).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 328
Total TN 26135
Total FP 201
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.685
Positive Predictive Value 0.683
Nr of predictions 31

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 14 247 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.58 0.55 0.62 16 2414 13 4 6 3 13
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 9 1 3 5 3
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.31 0.31 0.33 8 2226 23 1 15 7 18
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_h - 0.93 0.88 1.00 28 2112 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 0 0 0 0 0
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 7 0 5 2 6
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 253
Total TN 26145
Total FP 254
Total FP CONTRA 49
Total FP INCONS 168
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 226
Total Scores
MCC 0.525
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 31

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.31 0.31 0.32 9 2412 19 5 14 0 20
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.42 0.42 0.44 11 2225 21 1 13 7 15
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J0L_1 - 0.25 0.23 0.30 3 474 8 3 4 1 10
3J0L_h - 0.20 0.19 0.24 6 2115 19 3 16 0 26
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.