CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) Afold
MCC 0.694 > 0.627
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.665 ± 0.148 < 0.679 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.502 < 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.965 > 0.611
Total TP 248 < 321
Total TN 61243 > 60975
Total FP 51 < 328
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 64
Total FP INCONS 6 < 140
Total FP COMP 42 < 124
Total FN 246 > 173
P-value 2.48055519165e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 248
Total TN 61243
Total FP 51
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 246
Total Scores
MCC 0.694
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.665 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.502
Positive Predictive Value 0.965
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.77 0.60 1.00 6 168 0 0 0 0 4
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 357 0 0 0 0 18
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XXA_G 0.29 0.09 1.00 3 2042 0 0 0 0 32
3A2K_C 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1091 0 0 0 0 5
3G4S_9 0.73 0.54 1.00 14 2722 4 0 0 4 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.31 0.88 29 25503 4 3 1 0 66
3IZF_C 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 2611 2 0 0 2 6
3JYV_7 0.81 0.70 0.93 14 1096 3 0 1 2 6
3JYX_3 0.83 0.80 0.86 12 2364 13 0 2 11 3
3JYX_4 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 4749 2 0 0 2 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.46 0.22 1.00 8 2270 3 0 0 3 29
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3O58_2 0.93 0.87 1.00 27 2727 2 0 0 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 321
Total TN 60975
Total FP 328
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 140
Total FP COMP 124
Total FN 173
Total Scores
MCC 0.627
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3G4S_9 0.73 0.69 0.78 18 2713 13 2 3 8 8
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 29 0 6 23 5
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.