CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.695 > 0.298
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.649 ± 0.117 > 0.246 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.518 > 0.156
Positive Predictive Value 0.938 > 0.582
Total TP 366 > 110
Total TN 75013 < 75214
Total FP 71 < 89
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 14
Total FP INCONS 18 < 65
Total FP COMP 47 > 10
Total FN 341 < 597
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 366
Total TN 75013
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 341
Total Scores
MCC 0.695
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.649 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.938
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.77 0.60 1.00 6 168 0 0 0 0 4
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 357 0 0 0 0 18
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.43 0.18 1.00 2 1833 1 0 0 1 9
2XQD_Y 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1113 1 0 0 1 5
2XXA_G 0.29 0.09 1.00 3 2042 0 0 0 0 32
3A2K_C 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1091 0 0 0 0 5
3AMU_B 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1138 7 0 4 3 4
3GX2_A 0.68 0.46 1.00 13 1436 0 0 0 0 15
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.31 0.88 29 25503 4 3 1 0 66
3IZF_C 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 2611 2 0 0 2 6
3JYV_7 0.81 0.70 0.93 14 1096 3 0 1 2 6
3JYX_3 0.83 0.80 0.86 12 2364 13 0 2 11 3
3JYX_4 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 4749 2 0 0 2 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.46 0.22 1.00 8 2270 3 0 0 3 29
3O58_2 0.93 0.87 1.00 27 2727 2 0 0 2 4
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3PDR_A 0.75 0.58 0.97 29 4810 3 1 0 2 21
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 110
Total TN 75214
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 597
Total Scores
MCC 0.298
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.246 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.156
Positive Predictive Value 0.582
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.64 9 343 6 0 5 1 9
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1150 3 1 1 1 9
2XKV_B 0.38 0.36 0.40 4 1825 8 4 2 2 7
2XQD_Y -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 5 0 5 0 21
2XXA_G 0.37 0.20 0.70 7 2035 3 0 3 0 28
3A2K_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1106 2 0 2 0 22
3AMU_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1155 2 0 2 0 19
3GX2_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1442 1 0 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 886 1 1 0 0 7
3IZ4_A 0.26 0.11 0.63 10 25520 7 2 4 1 85
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2635 5 0 5 0 35
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1108 4 0 3 1 20
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2373 5 1 4 0 15
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4754 5 0 2 3 12
3LA5_A 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 937 0 0 0 0 8
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2274 4 0 4 0 37
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2751 3 0 3 0 31
3O58_3 0.28 0.14 0.60 3 4759 2 0 2 0 19
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4832 8 0 8 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2759 4 2 2 0 37
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.