CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) IPknot
MCC 0.825 > 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.789 ± 0.174 > 0.682 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.729 > 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.938 > 0.724
Total TP 137 > 123
Total TN 13094 > 13070
Total FP 17 < 61
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 11
Total FP INCONS 6 < 36
Total FP COMP 8 < 14
Total FN 51 < 65
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 137
Total TN 13094
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 51
Total Scores
MCC 0.825
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.789 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.729
Positive Predictive Value 0.938
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 13070
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.