CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.762 > 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ± 0.157 > 0.608 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.639 > 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.917 > 0.657
Total TP 154 > 140
Total TN 15474 > 15429
Total FP 27 < 88
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 19
Total FP INCONS 11 < 54
Total FP COMP 13 < 15
Total FN 87 < 101
P-value 1.03576421863e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 154
Total TN 15474
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.639
Positive Predictive Value 0.917
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 15429
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.657
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.