CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.825 > 0.031
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.789 ± 0.174 > 0.012 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.729 > 0.005
Positive Predictive Value 0.938 > 0.200
Total TP 137 > 1
Total TN 13094 < 13235
Total FP 17 < 23
Total FP CONTRA 3 > 0
Total FP INCONS 6 > 4
Total FP COMP 8 < 19
Total FN 51 < 187
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 137
Total TN 13094
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 51
Total Scores
MCC 0.825
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.789 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.729
Positive Predictive Value 0.938
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1
Total TN 13235
Total FP 23
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 187
Total Scores
MCC 0.031
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.012 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.005
Positive Predictive Value 0.200
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.