CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	CentroidAlifold(20)		RDfolder
MCC	0.872	>	0.611
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.855 ± 0.076	>	0.612 ± 0.205
Sensitivity	0.792	>	0.578
Positive Predictive Value	0.964	>	0.662
Total TP	244	>	178
Total TN	15706	>	15690
Total FP	37	<	110
Total FP CONTRA	3	<	24
Total FP INCONS	6	<	67
Total FP COMP	28	>	19
Total FN	64	<	130
P-value	2.1413769576e-08

Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RDfolder).

Total Scores
MCC	0.872
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.855 ± 0.076
Sensitivity	0.792
Positive Predictive Value	0.964
Nr of predictions	15

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.56	0.67	10	342	6	0	5	1	8
2WRQ_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	1143	12	0	0	12	0
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.36	1.00	4	1831	7	0	0	7	7
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.95	1.00	20	1109	1	0	0	1	1
3A2K_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.95	1.00	21	1087	0	0	0	0	1
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	19	1138	2	0	0	2	0
3GX2_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.86	1.00	24	1425	1	0	0	1	4
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.83	0.90	19	882	2	2	0	0	4
3JYV_7	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	1092	2	0	0	2	1
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.87	0.80	0.95	20	933	1	1	0	0	5
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.76	0.96	22	1510	1	0	1	0	7
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	23	1414	2	0	0	2	6
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	463	0	0	0	0	6
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.47	1.00	7	489	0	0	0	0	8

Total Scores
MCC	0.611
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.612 ± 0.205
Sensitivity	0.578
Positive Predictive Value	0.662
Nr of predictions	15

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2WRQ_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	1143	13	0	0	13	0
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1813	22	10	12	0	11
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.95	1.00	20	1109	1	0	0	1	1
3A2K_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.95	1.00	21	1087	0	0	0	0	1
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.21	0.22	4	1139	16	4	10	2	15
3GX2_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.57	0.64	16	1424	10	2	7	1	12
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	19	884	0	0	0	0	4
3JYV_7	tRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	1091	20	4	16	0	20
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.84	1.00	21	933	0	0	0	0	4
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.24	0.54	7	1520	6	1	5	0	22
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.38	0.48	11	1414	13	3	9	1	18
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.40	0.60	6	462	4	0	4	0	9
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.40	0.60	6	486	4	0	4	0	9

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.