CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Vsfold4
MCC 0.810 > 0.530
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.802 ± 0.071 > 0.572 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.716 > 0.524
Positive Predictive Value 0.921 > 0.545
Total TP 499 > 365
Total TN 74687 > 74559
Total FP 122 < 389
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 77
Total FP INCONS 22 < 228
Total FP COMP 79 < 84
Total FN 198 < 332
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 499
Total TN 74687
Total FP 122
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 198
Total Scores
MCC 0.810
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.802 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.716
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 7 0 0 7 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3IZF_C 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2607 6 0 2 4 4
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 23 0 3 20 3
3JYX_4 0.67 0.75 0.60 9 4741 9 5 1 3 3
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 9 0 2 7 2
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 365
Total TN 74559
Total FP 389
Total FP CONTRA 77
Total FP INCONS 228
Total FP COMP 84
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.530
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.524
Positive Predictive Value 0.545
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 341 1 0 0 1 2
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 13 0 0 13 1
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1808 27 13 14 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1110 1 0 0 1 2
2XXA_G -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 2016 29 1 28 0 35
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3AMU_B 0.73 0.74 0.74 14 1138 8 0 5 3 5
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 0 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.39 0.39 0.39 37 25441 63 15 43 5 58
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 6 0 4 2 6
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 16 5 1 10 5
3JYX_4 0.19 0.25 0.15 3 4736 33 9 8 16 9
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.66 0.59 0.73 22 2248 10 0 8 2 15
3O58_2 0.53 0.52 0.55 16 2725 16 3 10 3 15
3O58_3 0.12 0.14 0.11 3 4737 35 8 16 11 19
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.