CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Vsfold5
MCC 0.810 > 0.494
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.802 ± 0.071 > 0.541 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.716 > 0.495
Positive Predictive Value 0.921 > 0.502
Total TP 499 > 345
Total TN 74687 > 74542
Total FP 122 < 430
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 93
Total FP INCONS 22 < 249
Total FP COMP 79 < 88
Total FN 198 < 352
P-value 5.02343278931e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 499
Total TN 74687
Total FP 122
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 198
Total Scores
MCC 0.810
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.802 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.716
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.56 0.67 10 342 6 0 5 1 8
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 7 0 0 7 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 4 0 0 4 28
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3IZF_C 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2607 6 0 2 4 4
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 23 0 3 20 3
3JYX_4 0.67 0.75 0.60 9 4741 9 5 1 3 3
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 9 0 2 7 2
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 4 0 2 2 3
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 345
Total TN 74542
Total FP 430
Total FP CONTRA 93
Total FP INCONS 249
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 352
Total Scores
MCC 0.494
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.495
Positive Predictive Value 0.502
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 1 0 0 1 1
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 13 0 0 13 1
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1803 32 17 15 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1110 1 0 0 1 2
2XXA_G -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 2014 31 2 29 0 35
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3GX2_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 1425 9 0 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IZ4_A 0.31 0.31 0.33 29 25448 65 14 45 6 66
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 5 0 4 1 6
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3JYX_3 0.12 0.13 0.11 2 2360 20 6 10 4 13
3JYX_4 0.63 0.83 0.48 10 4735 32 9 2 21 2
3LA5_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 938 16 0 16 0 25
3NPB_A 0.62 0.54 0.71 20 2250 10 1 7 2 17
3O58_2 0.50 0.52 0.50 16 2722 19 3 13 3 15
3O58_3 0.51 0.59 0.45 13 4735 28 11 5 12 9
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.