CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.734 > 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.125 < 0.753 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.575 < 0.726
Positive Predictive Value 0.943 > 0.747
Total TP 283 < 357
Total TN 32057 > 31879
Total FP 47 < 166
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 36
Total FP INCONS 16 < 85
Total FP COMP 30 < 45
Total FN 209 > 135
P-value 0.011312336181

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 283
Total TN 32057
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 209
Total Scores
MCC 0.734
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.575
Positive Predictive Value 0.943
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
2XKV_B 0.67 0.73 0.62 8 1822 22 0 5 17 3
2XQD_Y 0.48 0.24 1.00 5 1124 1 0 0 1 16
2XXA_G 0.83 0.74 0.93 26 2017 4 0 2 2 9
3AKZ_H 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1122 1 0 0 1 15
3AMU_B 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1152 1 0 0 1 14
3IZF_C 0.67 0.46 1.00 16 2624 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3O58_2 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2738 0 0 0 0 15
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3UZL_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 4 1289 2 0 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 357
Total TN 31879
Total FP 166
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 135
Total Scores
MCC 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.753 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.726
Positive Predictive Value 0.747
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.45 0.50 0.42 8 1274 18 4 7 7 8
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.