CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) ProbKnot
MCC 0.694 > 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.100 < 0.694 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.546 < 0.701
Positive Predictive Value 0.885 > 0.622
Total TP 400 < 513
Total TN 89438 > 89065
Total FP 102 < 428
Total FP CONTRA 33 < 115
Total FP INCONS 19 < 197
Total FP COMP 50 < 116
Total FN 332 > 219
P-value 5.36778461742e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 400
Total TN 89438
Total FP 102
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.694
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.885
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
2XKV_B 0.67 0.73 0.62 8 1822 22 0 5 17 3
2XQD_Y 0.48 0.24 1.00 5 1124 1 0 0 1 16
2XXA_G 0.83 0.74 0.93 26 2017 4 0 2 2 9
3AKZ_H 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1122 1 0 0 1 15
3AMU_B 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1152 1 0 0 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.56 0.55 0.57 28 22391 30 19 2 9 23
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.43 0.77 41 25483 17 12 0 5 54
3IZF_C 0.67 0.46 1.00 16 2624 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3NPB_A 0.79 0.65 0.96 24 2253 5 0 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3O58_2 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2738 0 0 0 0 15
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3UZL_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 4 1289 2 0 0 2 12
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 513
Total TN 89065
Total FP 428
Total FP CONTRA 115
Total FP INCONS 197
Total FP COMP 116
Total FN 219
Total Scores
MCC 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.694 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.701
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1108 2 0 0 2 0
2XXA_G 0.25 0.26 0.26 9 2011 26 1 24 1 26
3AKZ_H 0.87 1.00 0.77 20 1101 9 6 0 3 0
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 9 0 5 4 4
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3IZF_C 0.90 0.91 0.89 32 2604 7 0 4 3 3
3J16_L 0.42 0.48 0.38 10 1133 16 3 13 0 11
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3O58_2 0.91 0.94 0.88 29 2721 10 0 4 6 2
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.92 1.00 0.84 16 1274 11 3 0 8 0
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.