CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.779 > 0.276
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.778 ± 0.099 > 0.140 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.768 > 0.077
Positive Predictive Value 0.796 < 1.000
Total TP 536 > 54
Total TN 49235 < 49854
Total FP 207 > 1
Total FP CONTRA 48 > 0
Total FP INCONS 89 > 0
Total FP COMP 70 > 1
Total FN 162 < 644
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 536
Total TN 49235
Total FP 207
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 89
Total FP COMP 70
Total FN 162
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.778 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.768
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XXA_G 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 2021 21 2 18 1 31
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 25 1424 1 0 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 11 0 5 6 3
3JYX_4 0.41 0.58 0.29 7 4732 25 11 6 8 5
3JYX_3 0.35 0.47 0.27 7 2352 21 14 5 2 8
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.87 0.84 0.91 31 2244 8 1 2 5 6
3O58_2 0.95 0.94 0.97 29 2724 7 0 1 6 2
3O58_3 0.44 0.41 0.47 9 4745 11 1 9 1 13
3PDR_A 0.88 0.86 0.90 43 4792 7 2 3 2 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 54
Total TN 49854
Total FP 1
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 644
Total Scores
MCC 0.276
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.140 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.077
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 467 0 0 0 0 18
2KUR_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 460 0 0 0 0 12
2KUU_A 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 440 0 0 0 0 11
2KUV_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 9 430 0 0 0 0 10
2KUW_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 9 461 0 0 0 0 9
2L1F_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 763 0 0 0 0 23
2L1F_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 791 0 0 0 0 24
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1835 0 0 0 0 11
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2045 0 0 0 0 35
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1500 0 0 0 0 30
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1449 0 0 0 0 28
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 23
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2640 0 0 0 0 35
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2378 0 0 0 0 15
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 954 0 0 0 0 25
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 37
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2754 0 0 0 0 31
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.