CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.778 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.109 > 0.619 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.757 > 0.445
Positive Predictive Value 0.806 < 0.878
Total TP 439 > 258
Total TN 38828 < 39079
Total FP 160 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 34 > 4
Total FP INCONS 72 > 32
Total FP COMP 54 > 13
Total FN 141 < 322
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 439
Total TN 38828
Total FP 160
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.778
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.757
Positive Predictive Value 0.806
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XXA_G 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 2021 21 2 18 1 31
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 25 1424 1 0 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.41 0.58 0.29 7 4732 25 11 6 8 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.87 0.84 0.91 31 2244 8 1 2 5 6
3O58_3 0.44 0.41 0.47 9 4745 11 1 9 1 13
3PDR_A 0.88 0.86 0.90 43 4792 7 2 3 2 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 258
Total TN 39079
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 322
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.445
Positive Predictive Value 0.878
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.67 0.56 0.83 10 455 2 0 2 0 8
2KUR_A 0.65 0.53 0.83 10 455 2 0 2 0 9
2KUU_A 0.67 0.56 0.83 10 435 2 0 2 0 8
2KUV_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 423 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 454 2 0 1 1 3
2L1F_A 0.83 0.78 0.90 18 743 2 0 2 0 5
2L1F_B 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 771 2 0 2 0 6
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 2 0 0 2 7
2XXA_G 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 2039 0 0 0 0 29
3A3A_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 12 1488 0 0 0 0 18
3GX2_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 14 1435 1 0 0 1 14
3IVN_B 0.62 0.52 0.75 12 887 4 2 2 0 11
3JYX_4 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 4753 4 0 0 4 9
3LA5_A 0.67 0.56 0.82 14 937 3 1 2 0 11
3NPB_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 13 2265 2 0 0 2 24
3O58_3 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 4758 1 0 0 1 16
3PDR_A 0.53 0.28 1.00 14 4826 0 0 0 0 36
3RKF_A 0.62 0.50 0.80 12 851 3 1 2 0 12
3SD1_A 0.56 0.38 0.85 11 1520 2 0 2 0 18
4A1C_2 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4509 0 0 0 0 13
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.