CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.683 > 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.698 ± 0.186 > 0.640 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.654 > 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.724 > 0.688
Total TP 134 > 128
Total TN 12783 > 12782
Total FP 65 < 74
Total FP CONTRA 17 = 17
Total FP INCONS 34 < 41
Total FP COMP 14 < 16
Total FN 71 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 12783
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.698 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 12782
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.688
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.