CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	CentroidHomfold‑LAST		Fold
MCC	0.782	>	0.709
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.788 ± 0.094	>	0.723 ± 0.110
Sensitivity	0.691	<	0.720
Positive Predictive Value	0.893	>	0.710
Total TP	427	<	445
Total TN	31118	>	30969
Total FP	98	<	258
Total FP CONTRA	10	<	45
Total FP INCONS	41	<	137
Total FP COMP	47	<	76
Total FN	191	>	173
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Fold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Fold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Fold).

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	427
Total TN	31118
Total FP	98
Total FP CONTRA	10
Total FP INCONS	41
Total FP COMP	47
Total FN	191

Total Scores
MCC	0.782
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.788 ± 0.094
Sensitivity	0.691
Positive Predictive Value	0.893
Nr of predictions	44

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
2LA5_A	-	0.77	0.71	0.83	5	269	1	0	1	0	2
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	193	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	517	11	0	11	0	18
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LDT_A	-	0.84	0.73	1.00	8	154	0	0	0	0	3
2LHP_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	15	246	0	0	0	0	0
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	123	3	0	0	3	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	2436	4	0	4	0	29
2LQZ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	124	2	0	0	2	0
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	1	0	0	1	1
2RRC_A	-	0.83	0.71	1.00	5	70	0	0	0	0	2
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	82	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.23	0.06	1.00	1	905	0	0	0	0	17
2YIE_X	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	537	0	0	0	0	0
2YIE_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	594	0	0	0	0	0
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.95	0.95	18	1138	4	0	1	3	1
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.62	0.89	8	475	3	0	1	2	5
3J0L_h	-	0.88	0.84	0.93	27	2111	4	0	2	2	5
3J0L_7	-	0.83	0.70	1.00	7	512	1	0	0	1	3
3J0L_g	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	176	0	0	0	0	2
3J0L_a	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	408	3	1	2	0	11
3J0L_8	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	69	0	0	0	0	0
3J0L_2	-	0.55	0.31	1.00	8	2242	0	0	0	0	18
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.81	1.00	17	1142	0	0	0	0	4
3NMU_E	-	0.57	0.33	1.00	1	215	3	0	0	3	2
3R9X_C	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	221	2	0	0	2	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.66	0.90	19	1512	2	1	1	0	10
3SIU_F	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	6	139	0	0	0	0	2
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	144	0	0	0	0	2
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	1	0	0	1	0
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	112	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.78	0.73	0.84	16	1257	4	0	3	1	6
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	1279	7	0	0	7	2
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.25	0.24	5	4495	29	8	8	13	15
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.78	0.83	29	2728	7	0	6	1	8
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.72	1.00	21	1416	1	0	0	1	8
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	485	0	0	0	0	4

^top

Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	445
Total TN	30969
Total FP	258
Total FP CONTRA	45
Total FP INCONS	137
Total FP COMP	76
Total FN	173

Total Scores
MCC	0.709
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.723 ± 0.110
Sensitivity	0.720
Positive Predictive Value	0.710
Nr of predictions	44

^top

2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LA5_A	-	0.77	0.71	0.83	5	269	3	0	1	2	2
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	193	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	513	15	3	12	0	18
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LDT_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	151	0	0	0	0	0
2LHP_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	15	246	0	0	0	0	0
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	123	3	0	0	3	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.90	0.90	0.90	26	2411	10	0	3	7	3
2LQZ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	124	2	0	0	2	0
2LWK_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	196	1	0	0	1	0
2RRC_A	-	0.83	0.71	1.00	5	70	0	0	0	0	2
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	82	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.79	0.83	0.75	15	886	8	0	5	3	3
2YIE_X	-	0.39	0.43	0.38	3	536	8	1	4	3	4
2YIE_Z	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	587	15	6	9	0	8
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.79	0.68	15	1135	10	0	7	3	4
3J0L_1	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	473	4	0	1	3	3
3J0L_h	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	28	2112	2	0	0	2	4
3J0L_7	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	507	12	2	10	0	10
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	174	4	0	2	2	2
3J0L_a	-	0.15	0.18	0.17	2	399	11	4	6	1	9
3J0L_8	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	69	0	0	0	0	0
3J0L_2	-	0.30	0.31	0.31	8	2224	25	2	16	7	18
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.76	0.76	16	1138	5	0	5	0	5
3NMU_E	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	207	11	6	3	2	3
3R9X_C	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	221	2	0	0	2	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.69	0.69	20	1504	9	4	5	0	9
3SIU_F	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	137	0	0	0	0	0
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	142	0	0	0	0	0
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	1	0	0	1	0
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	112	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.58	0.59	0.59	13	1254	9	2	7	0	9
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	16	1277	8	0	0	8	0
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.25	0.15	5	4482	43	11	18	14	15
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.84	0.89	31	2728	7	0	4	3	6
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.59	0.63	17	1410	11	4	6	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.33	0.45	5	461	7	0	6	1	10
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.33	0.42	5	484	8	0	7	1	10

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]