CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST MCFold
MCC 0.786 > 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.796 ± 0.097 > 0.652 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.705 > 0.701
Positive Predictive Value 0.885 > 0.652
Total TP 391 > 389
Total TN 27518 > 27363
Total FP 90 < 301
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 43
Total FP INCONS 41 < 165
Total FP COMP 39 < 93
Total FN 164 < 166
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 391
Total TN 27518
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.786
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.796 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.705
Positive Predictive Value 0.885
Nr of predictions 41

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.84 0.73 1.00 8 154 0 0 0 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2436 4 0 4 0 29
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2YIE_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 594 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_7 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 512 1 0 0 1 3
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_2 - 0.55 0.31 1.00 8 2242 0 0 0 0 18
3J0L_h - 0.88 0.84 0.93 27 2111 4 0 2 2 5
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 389
Total TN 27363
Total FP 301
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 165
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 166
Total Scores
MCC 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.652 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.701
Positive Predictive Value 0.652
Nr of predictions 41

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 265 10 0 10 0 7
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 152 0 0 0 0 1
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 11 0 0 11 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 3 0 0 3 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 2 0 0 2 0
2RRC_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 68 1 0 0 1 0
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 2 0 0 2 0
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 8 2 4 2 3
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 535 15 1 8 6 7
3AMU_B 0.50 0.58 0.44 11 1132 15 4 10 1 8
3J0L_1 - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 472 5 0 1 4 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 6 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 170 7 4 2 1 2
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.27 0.25 7 2222 29 4 17 8 19
3J0L_h - 0.98 0.97 1.00 31 2109 2 0 0 2 1
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1136 12 4 7 1 9
3NMU_E - 0.51 0.67 0.40 2 211 8 1 2 5 1
3R9X_C - 0.87 0.88 0.88 7 221 5 0 1 4 1
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3SIU_F - 0.53 0.63 0.50 5 135 5 2 3 0 3
3SN2_B 0.58 0.58 0.64 7 143 4 0 4 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 88 4 0 4 0 5
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 102 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.