CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Mastr(20)
MCC 0.782 > 0.694
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.165 > 0.627 ± 0.231
Sensitivity 0.723 > 0.573
Positive Predictive Value 0.851 > 0.849
Total TP 149 > 118
Total TN 13422 < 13458
Total FP 45 > 28
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 5
Total FP INCONS 17 > 16
Total FP COMP 19 > 7
Total FN 57 < 88
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 13422
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.782
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.165
Sensitivity 0.723
Positive Predictive Value 0.851
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 13458
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.694
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.231
Sensitivity 0.573
Positive Predictive Value 0.849
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 341 2 0 1 1 3
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.