CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Multilign(20)
MCC 0.782 > 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.165 > 0.676 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.723 > 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.851 > 0.697
Total TP 149 > 140
Total TN 13422 > 13396
Total FP 45 < 76
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 17
Total FP INCONS 17 < 44
Total FP COMP 19 > 15
Total FN 57 < 66
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 13422
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.782
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.165
Sensitivity 0.723
Positive Predictive Value 0.851
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 13396
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 66
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.676 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.697
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.