CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & PPfold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST PPfold(20)
MCC 0.782 > 0.780
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.165 > 0.743 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.723 > 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.851 < 0.860
Total TP 149 > 147
Total TN 13422 < 13426
Total FP 45 > 32
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 3
Total FP INCONS 17 < 21
Total FP COMP 19 > 8
Total FN 57 < 59
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and PPfold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and PPfold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and PPfold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and PPfold(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 13422
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.782
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.165
Sensitivity 0.723
Positive Predictive Value 0.851
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 147
Total TN 13426
Total FP 32
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.780
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.743 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.860
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 2 0 2 0 3
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.