CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RDfolder
MCC 0.815 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.797 ± 0.111 > 0.660 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.721 > 0.567
Positive Predictive Value 0.932 > 0.700
Total TP 276 > 217
Total TN 13641 > 13627
Total FP 37 < 109
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 21
Total FP INCONS 18 < 72
Total FP COMP 17 > 16
Total FN 107 < 166
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 276
Total TN 13641
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.815
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.797 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.721
Positive Predictive Value 0.932
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.84 0.73 1.00 8 154 0 0 0 0 3
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.23 0.06 1.00 1 905 0 0 0 0 17
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 594 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_7 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 512 1 0 0 1 3
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 217
Total TN 13627
Total FP 109
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 166
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.567
Positive Predictive Value 0.700
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 155 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.68 0.67 0.71 12 889 7 0 5 2 6
2YIE_X - 0.57 0.57 0.57 4 537 5 0 3 2 3
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J0L_8 - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 70 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 3 2 1 0 2
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 113 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.