CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.782 > 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.165 > 0.735 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.723 > 0.694
Positive Predictive Value 0.851 > 0.781
Total TP 149 > 143
Total TN 13422 > 13414
Total FP 45 < 56
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 11
Total FP INCONS 17 < 29
Total FP COMP 19 > 16
Total FN 57 < 63
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 13422
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.782
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.165
Sensitivity 0.723
Positive Predictive Value 0.851
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 13414
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 63
Total Scores
MCC 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.694
Positive Predictive Value 0.781
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.