CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Alterna
MCC 0.782 > 0.691
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.206 > 0.713 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.757 > 0.701
Positive Predictive Value 0.820 > 0.697
Total TP 109 > 101
Total TN 5225 > 5213
Total FP 36 < 63
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 15
Total FP INCONS 21 < 29
Total FP COMP 12 < 19
Total FN 35 < 43
P-value 2.00627773251e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Alterna).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Alterna).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 109
Total TN 5225
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 35
Total Scores
MCC 0.782
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.206
Sensitivity 0.757
Positive Predictive Value 0.820
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 5213
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 43
Total Scores
MCC 0.691
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.713 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.701
Positive Predictive Value 0.697
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - 0.37 0.40 0.36 4 508 9 2 5 2 6
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 169 9 3 4 2 2
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.63 0.62 0.67 8 472 8 0 4 4 5
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 3 2 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.68 0.75 0.63 12 1274 13 4 3 6 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.