CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.732 > 0.646
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.194 > 0.577 ± 0.221
Sensitivity 0.673 > 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.804 < 0.986
Total TP 115 > 73
Total TN 12521 < 12590
Total FP 50 > 7
Total FP CONTRA 6 > 1
Total FP INCONS 22 > 0
Total FP COMP 22 > 6
Total FN 56 < 98
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 12521
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 56
Total Scores
MCC 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.194
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.804
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 73
Total TN 12590
Total FP 7
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.646
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.577 ± 0.221
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.986
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3J16_L 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1153 0 0 0 0 15
3UZL_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 4 1289 2 0 0 2 12
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.