CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.732 > 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.194 > 0.608 ± 0.272
Sensitivity 0.673 > 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.804 > 0.752
Total TP 115 > 106
Total TN 12521 < 12523
Total FP 50 < 62
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 7
Total FP INCONS 22 < 28
Total FP COMP 22 < 27
Total FN 56 < 65
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 12521
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 56
Total Scores
MCC 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.194
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.804
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 12523
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.272
Sensitivity 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.752
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.83 0.75 0.92 12 1280 8 0 1 7 4
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.