CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.732 > 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.194 > 0.073 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.673 > 0.041
Positive Predictive Value 0.804 > 0.538
Total TP 115 > 7
Total TN 12521 < 12651
Total FP 50 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 6 > 0
Total FP INCONS 22 > 6
Total FP COMP 22 > 19
Total FN 56 < 164
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 12521
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 56
Total Scores
MCC 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.194
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.804
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 12651
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.073 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.041
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.