CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Vsfold5
MCC 0.813 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.109 > 0.639 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.776 > 0.547
Positive Predictive Value 0.858 > 0.556
Total TP 339 > 239
Total TN 23896 > 23861
Total FP 102 < 227
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 46
Total FP INCONS 47 < 145
Total FP COMP 46 > 36
Total FN 98 < 198
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold5).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 23896
Total FP 102
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.813
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.776
Positive Predictive Value 0.858
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 239
Total TN 23861
Total FP 227
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 145
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 198
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.547
Positive Predictive Value 0.556
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.31 0.31 0.32 9 2412 19 5 14 0 20
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J0L_2 - 0.42 0.42 0.44 11 2225 21 1 13 7 15
3J0L_1 - 0.25 0.23 0.30 3 474 8 3 4 1 10
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.20 0.19 0.24 6 2115 19 3 16 0 26
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.24 0.31 0.20 5 1268 20 9 11 0 11
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.