CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Cylofold
MCC 0.800 > 0.741
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.818 ± 0.065 > 0.752 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.804 > 0.724
Positive Predictive Value 0.803 > 0.767
Total TP 890 > 802
Total TN 59455 < 59519
Total FP 334 > 330
Total FP CONTRA 52 < 65
Total FP INCONS 167 < 178
Total FP COMP 115 > 87
Total FN 217 < 305
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Cylofold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 890
Total TN 59455
Total FP 334
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 167
Total FP COMP 115
Total FN 217
Total Scores
MCC 0.800
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.818 ± 0.065
Sensitivity 0.804
Positive Predictive Value 0.803
Nr of predictions 63

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 141 0 0 0 0 0
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 5 0 0 5 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 3 0 1 2 2
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.90 0.87 26 2410 11 0 4 7 3
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2RRC_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 68 0 0 0 0 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.86 0.86 18 1108 4 0 3 1 3
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.12 4 2012 30 2 27 1 31
2Y9C_V - 0.79 0.83 0.75 15 886 8 0 5 3 3
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 4 0 0 4 0
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3AKZ_H 0.44 0.50 0.40 10 1102 18 6 9 3 10
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1436 8 3 5 0 7
3AMU_B 0.75 0.79 0.71 15 1136 9 0 6 3 4
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 11 0 5 6 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 512 7 1 6 0 10
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.31 0.28 8 2221 26 2 19 5 18
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 3 0 1 2 3
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.88 0.88 28 2108 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 1 0 0 1 2
3J16_L 0.55 0.57 0.55 12 1137 10 3 7 0 9
3NDB_M - 0.98 0.98 0.98 43 3670 6 0 1 5 1
3NKB_B - 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 713 9 0 9 0 6
3NMU_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 213 3 0 0 3 0
3O58_3 0.32 0.36 0.29 8 4736 21 7 13 1 14
3O58_2 0.92 0.94 0.91 29 2722 10 0 3 7 2
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 1 0 0 1 0
3PDR_A 0.83 0.86 0.80 43 4786 13 5 6 2 7
3R4F_A - 0.81 0.82 0.82 18 884 5 2 2 1 4
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.87 0.88 0.88 7 137 1 0 1 0 1
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
3UZL_B 0.90 0.88 0.93 14 1278 8 0 1 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 802
Total TN 59519
Total FP 330
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 178
Total FP COMP 87
Total FN 305
Total Scores
MCC 0.741
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.724
Positive Predictive Value 0.767
Nr of predictions 63

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.85 0.87 0.83 20 2000 12 4 0 8 3
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 511 1 0 0 1 4
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 336 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 229 0 0 0 0 4
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.56 0.55 0.57 16 2412 13 4 8 1 13
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
2Y9C_V - 0.72 0.72 0.72 13 888 8 0 5 3 5
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AM1_B - 0.83 0.76 0.92 22 1442 2 0 2 0 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J0L_7 - 0.41 0.50 0.36 5 505 10 3 6 1 5
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.55 0.50 0.62 16 2114 10 2 8 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3NDB_M - 0.68 0.64 0.74 28 3676 14 2 8 4 16
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 1 212 6 1 2 3 2
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.63 0.42 1.00 5 149 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.45 0.50 0.42 8 1274 18 4 7 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.