CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.615 > 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.659 ± 0.207 > 0.608 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.614 > 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.627 < 0.657
Total TP 148 > 140
Total TN 15406 < 15429
Total FP 110 > 88
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 19
Total FP INCONS 67 > 54
Total FP COMP 22 > 15
Total FN 93 < 101
P-value 0.323670796354

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 148
Total TN 15406
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.615
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.659 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.614
Positive Predictive Value 0.627
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.12 4 2012 30 2 27 1 31
3AMU_B 0.75 0.79 0.71 15 1136 9 0 6 3 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
4A1C_3 0.81 0.81 0.81 30 2726 10 0 7 3 7
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 15429
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.657
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.