CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold MCFold
MCC 0.749 > 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.760 ± 0.071 > 0.667 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.732 > 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.776 > 0.652
Total TP 736 > 704
Total TN 53043 > 52911
Total FP 283 < 504
Total FP CONTRA 54 < 72
Total FP INCONS 158 < 304
Total FP COMP 71 < 128
Total FN 270 < 302
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 736
Total TN 53043
Total FP 283
Total FP CONTRA 54
Total FP INCONS 158
Total FP COMP 71
Total FN 270
Total Scores
MCC 0.749
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.760 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.732
Positive Predictive Value 0.776
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 511 1 0 0 1 4
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 336 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 229 0 0 0 0 4
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.56 0.55 0.57 16 2412 13 4 8 1 13
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
2Y9C_V - 0.72 0.72 0.72 13 888 8 0 5 3 5
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AM1_B - 0.83 0.76 0.92 22 1442 2 0 2 0 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.55 0.50 0.62 16 2114 10 2 8 0 16
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_7 - 0.41 0.50 0.36 5 505 10 3 6 1 5
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3NDB_M - 0.68 0.64 0.74 28 3676 14 2 8 4 16
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 1 212 6 1 2 3 2
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.63 0.42 1.00 5 149 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 704
Total TN 52911
Total FP 504
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 304
Total FP COMP 128
Total FN 302
Total Scores
MCC 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.652
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 141 1 0 0 1 0
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 5 0 0 5 0
2L1F_A 0.79 0.78 0.82 18 741 4 0 4 0 5
2L1F_B 0.80 0.79 0.83 19 768 4 0 4 0 5
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 1 0 0 1 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 1 0 0 1 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 2 0 0 2 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 265 10 0 10 0 7
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 152 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 11 0 0 11 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 2 0 0 2 0
2RRC_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 68 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.20 0.27 0.16 3 1816 30 4 12 14 8
2XQD_Y 0.39 0.43 0.38 9 1105 18 2 13 3 12
2XXA_G 0.23 0.26 0.24 9 2007 30 1 28 1 26
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.72 0.59 13 884 12 1 8 3 5
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 535 15 1 8 6 7
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 8 2 4 2 3
3AKZ_H 0.46 0.50 0.43 10 1104 16 5 8 3 10
3AM1_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 1437 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.50 0.58 0.44 11 1132 15 4 10 1 8
3IZF_C 0.92 0.94 0.89 33 2603 10 0 4 6 2
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 170 7 4 2 1 2
3J0L_1 - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 472 5 0 1 4 2
3J0L_h - 0.98 0.97 1.00 31 2109 2 0 0 2 1
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.27 0.25 7 2222 29 4 17 8 19
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 6 9 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3J16_L 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1136 12 4 7 1 9
3NDB_M - 0.29 0.30 0.30 13 3671 35 1 29 5 31
3NKB_B - 0.68 0.74 0.64 14 713 8 2 6 0 5
3NMU_E - 0.51 0.67 0.40 2 211 8 1 2 5 1
3O58_2 0.25 0.29 0.23 9 2715 31 6 24 1 22
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 1 0 0 1 0
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3R4F_A - 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 884 4 0 1 3 1
3R9X_C - 0.87 0.88 0.88 7 221 5 0 1 4 1
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3SIU_F - 0.53 0.63 0.50 5 135 5 2 3 0 3
3SN2_B 0.58 0.58 0.64 7 143 4 0 4 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 88 4 0 4 0 5
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 102 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.