CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Mastr(20)
MCC 0.703 > 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.162 > 0.617 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.703 > 0.503
Positive Predictive Value 0.711 < 0.890
Total TP 249 > 178
Total TN 25975 < 26125
Total FP 136 > 46
Total FP CONTRA 31 > 5
Total FP INCONS 70 > 17
Total FP COMP 35 > 24
Total FN 105 < 176
P-value 2.20167918023e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 249
Total TN 25975
Total FP 136
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 105
Total Scores
MCC 0.703
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.711
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 178
Total TN 26125
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 176
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.503
Positive Predictive Value 0.890
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 341 2 0 1 1 3
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3IZF_C 0.91 0.91 0.91 32 2605 9 0 3 6 3
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 12 0 2 10 2
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.