CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.650 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.271 > 0.626 ± 0.265
Sensitivity 0.641 > 0.560
Positive Predictive Value 0.674 < 0.705
Total TP 118 > 103
Total TN 8188 < 8217
Total FP 62 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 10
Total FP INCONS 49 > 33
Total FP COMP 5 < 6
Total FN 66 < 81
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 8188
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 66
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.271
Sensitivity 0.641
Positive Predictive Value 0.674
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 8217
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.265
Sensitivity 0.560
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.