CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.680 > 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.715 ± 0.178 > 0.568 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.674 > 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.696 < 0.847
Total TP 211 > 122
Total TN 20424 < 20583
Total FP 118 > 27
Total FP CONTRA 28 > 1
Total FP INCONS 64 > 21
Total FP COMP 26 > 5
Total FN 102 < 191
P-value 2.30549897711e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 211
Total TN 20424
Total FP 118
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 64
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.715 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.674
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 20583
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 191
Total Scores
MCC 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.847
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_A 0.83 0.78 0.90 18 743 2 0 2 0 5
2L1F_B 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 771 2 0 2 0 6
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 2 0 0 2 7
2XXA_G 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 2039 0 0 0 0 29
3O58_3 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 4758 1 0 0 1 16
3PDR_A 0.53 0.28 1.00 14 4826 0 0 0 0 36
3RKF_A 0.62 0.50 0.80 12 851 3 1 2 0 12
3SD1_A 0.56 0.38 0.85 11 1520 2 0 2 0 18
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.