CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.775 > 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.195 > 0.644 ± 0.295
Sensitivity 0.766 > 0.570
Positive Predictive Value 0.791 < 0.818
Total TP 121 > 90
Total TN 9449 < 9492
Total FP 43 > 26
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 5
Total FP INCONS 20 > 15
Total FP COMP 11 > 6
Total FN 37 < 68
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 121
Total TN 9449
Total FP 43
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 37
Total Scores
MCC 0.775
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.766
Positive Predictive Value 0.791
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 9492
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 68
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.295
Sensitivity 0.570
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.