CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.732 > 0.315
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.753 ± 0.115 > 0.243 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.726 > 0.185
Positive Predictive Value 0.747 > 0.555
Total TP 357 > 91
Total TN 31879 < 32193
Total FP 166 > 76
Total FP CONTRA 36 > 8
Total FP INCONS 85 > 65
Total FP COMP 45 > 3
Total FN 135 < 401
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 357
Total TN 31879
Total FP 166
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 135
Total Scores
MCC 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.753 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.726
Positive Predictive Value 0.747
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.45 0.50 0.42 8 1274 18 4 7 7 8
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 32193
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 401
Total Scores
MCC 0.315
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.243 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.185
Positive Predictive Value 0.555
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 370 1 0 1 0 16
2L1F_A 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 742 3 0 3 0 5
2L1F_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 769 2 0 2 0 4
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.64 9 343 6 0 5 1 9
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2XKV_B 0.38 0.36 0.40 4 1825 8 4 2 2 7
2XQD_Y -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 5 0 5 0 21
2XXA_G 0.37 0.20 0.70 7 2035 3 0 3 0 28
3AKZ_H -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 2 0 2 0 20
3AMU_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1155 2 0 2 0 19
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2635 5 0 5 0 35
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1158 1 0 1 0 21
3O58_3 0.28 0.14 0.60 3 4759 2 0 2 0 19
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2751 3 0 3 0 31
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4832 8 0 8 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1287 6 3 3 0 16
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.