CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.787 > 0.783
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.824 ± 0.197 > 0.791 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.765 > 0.718
Positive Predictive Value 0.820 < 0.863
Total TP 114 > 107
Total TN 6179 < 6194
Total FP 30 > 22
Total FP CONTRA 6 > 5
Total FP INCONS 19 > 12
Total FP COMP 5 = 5
Total FN 35 < 42
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 114
Total TN 6179
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 35
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.824 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.820
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 107
Total TN 6194
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 42
Total Scores
MCC 0.783
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.718
Positive Predictive Value 0.863
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.