CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.773 > 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.806 ± 0.208 > 0.671 ± 0.302
Sensitivity 0.743 > 0.622
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.760
Total TP 110 > 92
Total TN 5554 < 5568
Total FP 27 < 31
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 8
Total FP INCONS 18 < 21
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 38 < 56
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 110
Total TN 5554
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 38
Total Scores
MCC 0.773
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.806 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.743
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 5568
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 56
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.302
Sensitivity 0.622
Positive Predictive Value 0.760
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.