CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold RDfolder
MCC 0.821 > 0.695
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.804 ± 0.084 > 0.710 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.825 > 0.657
Positive Predictive Value 0.827 > 0.752
Total TP 706 > 562
Total TN 30904 < 31011
Total FP 209 < 214
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 45
Total FP INCONS 114 < 140
Total FP COMP 61 > 29
Total FN 150 < 294
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 706
Total TN 30904
Total FP 209
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 114
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 150
Total Scores
MCC 0.821
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.804 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.825
Positive Predictive Value 0.827
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 201 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 281 0 0 0 0 1
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 142 0 0 0 0 1
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_A 0.91 0.91 0.91 21 740 2 0 2 0 2
2L1F_B 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 767 2 0 2 0 2
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 3 0 1 2 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2WWQ_V 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1186 3 0 0 3 1
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.79 0.83 0.75 15 886 8 0 5 3 3
2YIE_X - 0.39 0.43 0.38 3 536 8 1 4 3 4
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 4 0 4 0 5
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 2 0 0 2 0
3AM1_B - 0.86 0.86 0.86 25 1437 4 0 4 0 4
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 507 12 2 10 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 4 0 1 3 3
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.15 0.18 0.17 2 399 11 4 6 1 9
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 0 5 0 5
3NKB_B - 0.41 0.42 0.42 8 716 11 4 7 0 11
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 207 11 6 3 2 3
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 562
Total TN 31011
Total FP 214
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 140
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 294
Total Scores
MCC 0.695
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.710 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.657
Positive Predictive Value 0.752
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 201 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 285 7 2 5 0 12
2KUR_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 451 0 0 0 0 3
2KUU_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 432 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 423 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 357 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 4 0 0 4 0
2L1F_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 750 13 2 11 0 23
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 155 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.74 0.88 14 1188 4 0 2 2 5
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1813 22 10 12 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.68 0.67 0.71 12 889 7 0 5 2 6
2YIE_X - 0.57 0.57 0.57 4 537 5 0 3 2 3
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3AKZ_H 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1106 12 1 9 2 9
3AM1_B - 0.52 0.52 0.54 15 1438 13 4 9 0 14
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 3 2 1 0 2
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_8 - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 70 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 302 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 887 4 2 1 1 6
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 113 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.