CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.722 > 0.336
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.758 ± 0.106 > 0.284 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.750 > 0.196
Positive Predictive Value 0.700 > 0.585
Total TP 619 > 162
Total TN 92033 < 92640
Total FP 382 > 130
Total FP CONTRA 88 > 24
Total FP INCONS 177 > 91
Total FP COMP 117 > 15
Total FN 206 < 663
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 619
Total TN 92033
Total FP 382
Total FP CONTRA 88
Total FP INCONS 177
Total FP COMP 117
Total FN 206
Total Scores
MCC 0.722
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.758 ± 0.106
Sensitivity 0.750
Positive Predictive Value 0.700
Nr of predictions 31

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 0.91 0.91 0.91 21 740 2 0 2 0 2
2L1F_B 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 767 2 0 2 0 2
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2WWQ_V 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1186 3 0 0 3 1
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 2010 1 0 0 1 0
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 2 0 0 2 0
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22345 95 40 38 17 34
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 8 0 5 3 4
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 0 5 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3O58_2 0.86 0.87 0.84 27 2722 12 0 5 7 4
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3UZL_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1277 8 0 0 8 0
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 162
Total TN 92640
Total FP 130
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 91
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 663
Total Scores
MCC 0.336
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.284 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.196
Positive Predictive Value 0.585
Nr of predictions 31

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 451 1 0 1 0 4
2KUU_A 0.85 0.78 0.93 14 432 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.85 0.79 0.94 15 423 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.75 0.67 0.86 12 456 3 0 2 1 6
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 370 1 0 1 0 16
2L1F_A 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 742 3 0 3 0 5
2L1F_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 769 2 0 2 0 4
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.64 9 343 6 0 5 1 9
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2WWQ_V -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1199 6 0 5 1 19
2XKV_B 0.38 0.36 0.40 4 1825 8 4 2 2 7
2XQD_Y -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 5 0 5 0 21
2XXA_G 0.37 0.20 0.70 7 2035 3 0 3 0 28
3AKZ_H -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 2 0 2 0 20
3AMU_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1155 2 0 2 0 19
3IYQ_A 0.16 0.10 0.26 5 22421 21 10 4 7 46
3IZ4_A 0.26 0.11 0.63 10 25520 7 2 4 1 85
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2635 5 0 5 0 35
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1158 1 0 1 0 21
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2274 4 0 4 0 37
3O58_3 0.28 0.14 0.60 3 4759 2 0 2 0 19
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2751 3 0 3 0 31
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4832 8 0 8 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1287 6 3 3 0 16
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2759 4 2 2 0 37
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.