CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.745 > 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.203 > 0.640 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.756 > 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.742 > 0.688
Total TP 155 > 128
Total TN 12759 < 12782
Total FP 73 < 74
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 17
Total FP INCONS 33 < 41
Total FP COMP 19 > 16
Total FN 50 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 12759
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 50
Total Scores
MCC 0.745
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.203
Sensitivity 0.756
Positive Predictive Value 0.742
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 12 16 14 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 12782
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.688
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.